Choice between Nissan Pathfinder And Nissan Murano is not just a comparison of two cars, but a determination of priorities: do you need roominess for a large family or a stylish urban crossover with a premium finish? Both models belong to different classes - Pathfinder is positioned as a full-size family SUV with light off-road capabilities, and Murano - as an elegant mid-size crossover with an emphasis on comfort and technology.
In this article we will analyze the key differences according to 7 criteria: from dimensions and engines to the cost of ownership and reviews of real owners. You will find out which model is 23% more economical in the city, but at the same time loses 40% in carrying capacity, and also why Murano is often called the “Japanese Lexus” among Nissan crossovers. Are you ready? Then let's begin a detailed analysis!
1. Dimensions and capacity: who will win the battle of space?
The first thing that catches your eye is the difference in size. Pathfinder 30 cm longer, 10 cm wider and 5 cm higher, which immediately gives it an advantage in practicality. Trunk volume as standard:
- 📦 Pathfinder: 453 l (up to 2,260 l with seats folded)
- 📦 Murano: 395 l (up to 1,600 l)
But numbers don't tell the whole story. B Pathfinder the third row of seats (optional) allows you to accommodate 7 passengers, while Murano offers only 5 seats with an emphasis on individual comfort. But the Murano's interior is made of higher quality materials - there is soft leather with stitching, aluminum inserts, and improved sound insulation. The Pathfinder is simpler in this regard, but its seats fold almost flat, which is convenient for transporting large cargo.
- Capacity and 7 seats
- Stylish design and premium interior
- Balance between practicality and comfort
Another nuance is ground clearance. U Pathfinder it is 185 mm versus 170 mm for Murano. This makes the first model more versatile for trips to the country or light off-road, while the Murano is focused exclusively on asphalt. However, do not be deceived: despite the external "cross-country ability", Pathfinder does not have a frame structure and a full-fledged 4WD drive - its system Intelligent AWD more for confidence on wet roads than for serious off-road use.
2. Engines and dynamics: who is faster, who is more economical?
Both models in Russia are equipped with naturally aspirated gasoline engines, but with different characteristics:
| Parameter | Nissan Pathfinder (3.5 V6) | Nissan Murano (3.5 V6) |
|---|---|---|
| Volume, l | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Power, hp | 284 | 249 |
| Torque, Nm | 358 | 336 |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h, s | 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Consumption in the city, l/100 km | 13.5 | 11.8 |
On paper Pathfinder it looks more powerful, and it is true - it accelerates faster and behaves more confidently on the track. However Murano compensates for less power with a more refined suspension and CVT Xtronic CVT, which is tuned more softly here than in Pathfinder. Important point: Murano is 15% more economical in the urban cycle thanks to optimized gear ratios and lower weight (200 kg lighter).
But there's a catch: the CVT Murano does not like sudden starts and prolonged loads. When towing a trailer (maximum weight 907 kg versus 2,268 kg for the Pathfinder), it overheats more quickly. If you need a vehicle to tow a boat or trailer, the choice is clear.
When test-driving a Murano, be sure to check the smoothness of the variator at speeds of 40-60 km/h - jerking often occurs here if the previous owner did not monitor the oil in the CVT.
3. Suspension and handling: city vs highway
Murano built on a platform Nissan D, which formed the basis and Qashqai, and X-Trail. This means a stiffer and more responsive suspension, ideal for urban conditions. The steering is lighter here and the turning radius is smaller (5.6 m versus 6.1 m for the Pathfinder). In traffic jams and in parking lots, the Murano is more maneuverable and comfortable.
Pathfinder, in turn, uses the platform Nissan D2, adapted for heavy loads. Its suspension is softer, but less informative. At high speeds (over 120 km/h), the body begins to “float”, while the Murano holds the road more confidently. But the Pathfinder absorbs bumps on rough country roads better.
- 🚗 Murano: the best choice for the city and high-quality highways
- 🏞️ Pathfinder: preferable for mixed cycle (city + countryside)
If you often drive on gravel roads or dirt roads, the Pathfinder will perform better thanks to its higher ground clearance and power-hungry suspension.
4. Options and equipment: where are the most “goodies”?
Here Murano definitely takes the lead. Even in the basic configuration it offers:
- 🎛️ Leather interior with heated and ventilated front seats
- 🔊 Premium audio system Bose with 11 speakers
- 🌡️ Dual-zone climate control with air purification function
- 📱 Wireless charging for smartphone and
Apple CarPlay/Android Auto
Pathfinder in top versions it boasts a third row of seats and a system ProPILOT Assist (adaptive cruise + lane keeping), but in terms of finishing it loses. For example, the Murano even has interior lighting with a choice of colors, and the plastic on the dashboard is soft to the touch. The Pathfinder is dominated by hard plastics, which is typical for family SUVs.
However, Pathfinder has a trump card - the system Intelligent Around View Monitor with 4 cameras, which gives all-round visibility. This is invaluable when parking a large vehicle. In Murano, this option is only available in the maximum configuration.
Which Murano options often break down?
The most problematic elements are electric seat drives (especially position memory) and system sensors Safety Shield. After 100,000 km, glitches with automatic braking may begin.
5. Reliability and cost of ownership: which is cheaper to maintain?
According to services CarComplaints And Drive2, Murano has a higher reliability rating, but only subject to timely maintenance. Main "diseases":
- ⚠️ CVT
JF011E— requires oil changes every 60,000 km (cost ~25,000 ₽) - ⚠️ Oil leaks from under the valve cover after 150,000 km
- ⚠️ Electronics (parking sensors, cameras) - sensitive to moisture
Pathfinder in this regard, it’s simpler: its classic “automatic” Jatco JR710E more durable than the variator, and the engine VQ35DE known for its reliability. However, there are some nuances here:
⚠️ Attention: Pre-2020 Pathfinders had a problem with subframe corrosion. Before purchasing, be sure to check this place on a lift - repairs will cost 80,000–120,000 rubles.
Let's compare the cost of ownership (based on data for 5 years/100,000 km):
| Expense item | Pathfinder | Murano |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance (oils, filters) | ~180 000 ₽ | ~220 000 ₽ |
| Chassis repair | ~150 000 ₽ | ~120 000 ₽ |
| Spare parts (average price) | 15% cheaper | 20% more expensive |
Conclusion: Pathfinder is cheaper to maintain, but Murano requires fewer unscheduled repairs when used properly. If you're willing to invest in quality CVT oil and original parts, the Murano will be more reliable in the long run.
6. Prices and residual value: what is more profitable to buy?
On the primary market (2026) prices start from:
- 💰 Nissan Pathfinder: from 3,890,000 ₽ (basic equipment)
- 💰 Nissan Murano: from 4,150,000 ₽
However, in the secondary market the picture is different. The Murano holds its value better: a three-year-old example in good condition can sell for 70-75% of its original value, while the Pathfinder loses up to 50% over the same period. This is due to higher demand for premium crossovers and lower mileage of the Murano (more often used as a "second family car").
If you are considering a used purchase, pay attention to:
Mileage up to 100,000 km (critical for Murano CVT)
Service book with notes on changing the oil in the CVT/automatic transmission
Suspension condition (knocking in Murano struts is a common problem)
The operation of electronics (especially cameras and sensors in Pathfinder) -->
Interesting fact: Murano women buy more often (62% of owners according to Autostat), whereas Pathfinder families with children choose (78% of buyers). This affects both the style of operation and the condition of cars on the secondary market.
7. Owner reviews: real operating experience
After analyzing more than 500 reviews on Drive2 And Drom.ru, we've highlighted the key claims and praises for each model:
Nissan Pathfinder:
- ✅ "For 3 years, not a single breakdown, only maintenance. The car is like a tank - it endures everything"
- ✅ "The third row saved us at the dacha - it accommodated 5 adults + two children + a dog"
- ❌ "Consumption on the highway 11 l/100 km is too much. I attached a trailer and it increased to 16 l"
- ❌ "Noise insulation is weak, you can hear everything at speed"
Nissan Murano:
- ✅ "The interior is like a Lexus, but cheaper. The leather does not squeak even after 5 years"
- ✅ "The variator is smooth if you change the oil on time"
- ❌ "It doesn't heat well in winter - it takes about 15 minutes for the interior to warm up"
- ❌ "The suspension is stiff, it knocks on bumps"
Curious trend: owners Murano complain more often about little things (noise, climate), while Pathfinder the complaints are of a systemic nature (fuel consumption, handling). This once again emphasizes the difference in the target audience: the first want comfort, the second want practicality.
More than 80% of Murano owners would buy this model again, compared with 65% of Pathfinder owners. The main reason is the emotional component: Murano is liked as a “car for yourself”, and Pathfinder is perceived as a “workhorse”.
FAQ: Frequently asked questions about Pathfinder and Murano
Is it possible to install a third row of seats in the Murano?
No, the body design and platform do not provide for this possibility. The maximum is a child seat on the second row. If you need a 7-seat crossover, consider only the Pathfinder or alternatives like Toyota Highlander.
Which car is best for towing a trailer?
Pathfinder clearly wins: its maximum towed trailer weight is 2,268 kg (with brakes), while Murano this figure is limited to 907 kg. In addition, the Pathfinder has a more powerful engine and a classic automatic transmission that handles loads better than a CVT.
Is it true that the Murano is a "women's" car?
Purchase statistics show that the answer is yes: About 62% of Murano owners are women. This is due to the ease of parking, soft suspension and premium design. However, this does not mean that the car is not suitable for men. For example, Murano is often chosen as a second car in the family for city trips.
Which model is safer in an accident?
Based on crash test results IIHS (2023), both models received the highest score Top Safety Pick+. However Murano has an advantage thanks to the system Safety Shield 360 (standard from 2020), which includes automatic braking, blind spot monitoring and lane keeping assist. B Pathfinder similar features are available only in top trim levels.
Is it worth taking a Murano with more than 150,000 km mileage?
Only if there is a complete service history, especially for changing the oil in the variator. After 150,000 km, problems often begin with:
- Variator belt (replacement cost ~150,000 ₽)
- Wheel bearings (characteristic hum at speed)
- Electronics (parking sensors, cameras)
If your budget is limited, it is better to consider Pathfinder - it is easier to repair and cheaper to buy spare parts.
To summarize, we can say that the choice between Pathfinder And Murano depends on your lifestyle. If you need a reliable workhorse for the family with the possibility of rare trips into nature, take it Pathfinder. If your priority is style, comfort and premium finishes for city driving, your choice is Murano. Which option is closer to you? Share in the comments!